ERa Ligand Binding Domain (EST)

  Background Color:White Blue Black
Reset orientation. Remove labels. Remove dots.
  Rotate:
Y 90° Y -90° X 90° X -90°
  Highlight:

  1.Estradiol Binding Site.
H-bond distances.
a. Close contacts: <4.5 Å, yellow.
 Contact atoms, Spacefill.
 Contact atoms, Sticks (+dots).
b. Conserved residues.
  2. Helix 12 Binding Pocket.
Close contacts: ER atoms, yellow; Helix 12 atoms, green.
Binding site, Spacefill.
Helix 12, Dot surface.
  3. Comparison to the dimer.
Dimer contacts, Spacefill.
Tetramer contacts, Spacefill.
Contacts in both, Spacefill.
Tetramer of the ERa LBD (residues 305-544) with Bound Estradiol (EST).
This tetrameric form is most likely a crystallographic artefact. The solution structure is known to be dimeric. The tetramer is stabilized by two interchain disulfide bonds (labelled "S-S" above) and by the helix 12 contacts between adjacent dimers. Nevertheless, the model shows the "high degree of positional variability exhibited by . . . the aberrant position of helix 12".
Monomer subunits A and D are Cartoons, colored Structure; EST is Spacefill, colored green. The 12 helices are numbered in chain A.
Monomer subunits B and C are Cartoons, colored blue. The N- and C-termini of chain B are labeled. See Tanenbaum, et al. (1998) Fig. 2A.
The numbered "Highlight" buttons above display details of the estradiol and Helix 12 interface sites on ER. The following paragraphs briefly describe the displays.
1. Close-up of the EST binding site. H-bonding residues are Ball & Stick; apolar residues in the EST plane are shown as Sticks, colored CPK. (Slab Mode on)   H-bond distances in Å. See Tanenbaum, Fig. 3A & C.
  a. Close contacts: ER atoms <4.5 Å from EST are yellow. Display the contact atoms as Spacefill or as Sticks (dots).
  b. Conserved residues in all steroid receptors (green-blinker). See Tanenbaum, Fig. 3C.
When this model was aligned with the dimer model of Brzozowski, et al. (1997), the superimposed structures were nearly identical in the EST-binding site region. (See the link below under "Structural Alignments".)

2. Close-up of the Helix 12 binding site on chain C. Helix 12 residues of chain A are shown as Sticks, colored magenta. It is bound to part of the H12 binding pocket of chain C. See Tanenbaum Fig. 1B.
Helix 12 or its site can be highlighted as follows:
  Close contacts: Chain C atoms <4.5 Å from Helix 12 are yellow; Helix 12 atoms of chain A <4.5 Å from chain C are green.
  View the chain C binding site as Spacefill and/or the Helix 12 with a Dot surface.

3. Comparison with the dimer structure of Brzozowski, et al. (1997). The H12 interface side chains are Sticks. Those found only in this structure are red; those found only in the Brzozowski structure are green; those found in both are yellow.
Additional highlight buttons:
  Brzozowski H12 contact residues: Spacefill, green.
  Tanenbaum H12 contact residues: Spacefill, red.
  H12 contact residues in both models: Spacefill, yellow.
The helix 12 binding pocket here is only about half the size of that seen in other ER-agonist structures.

  Page Top
This estrogen receptor structure is described in Tanenbaum, D. M., Wang, Y., Williams, S. P., Sigler, P. B. (1998) "Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor's ligand binding domains". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:5998.     PubMed.     [1a52.pdb; 2.8 Å; R = 0.22]

Additional ER structures:
A. Estrogen Receptora   ERa complexes with bound:
    Estradiol (EST), an agonist.
    Raloxifene (RAL), an antagonist.
    Diethylstilbestrol (DES), an agonist & the NR Box II peptide.
    Tamoxifen (OHT), an antagonist.
    (Estradiol (EST), in an unusual tetrameric structure.)
B. Estrogen Receptorb   ERb complexes with bound:
    Genistein (GEN), a partial agonist.
    Raloxifene (RAL), an antagonist.
C. Structural Alignments   Pairwise superimposed comparisons:
    ERa (EST) and ERb (GEN), ERa vs. ERb in agonist complexes.
    ERa (RAL) and ERb (RAL), ERa vs. ERb in antagonist complexes.
    ERa: DES and OHT, ERa: agonist vs. antagonist complex.
    ERa: EST, Wild type ER vs. a triple mutant (Helix 12 in the antagonist conformation).
    ERa: EST, The Brzozowski, et al. (1997) vs. Tanenbaum, et al. (1998) models.
    "Helix 12 Gallery": ERa-EST vs. All five ER-antagonist (SERM) models.
D. DNA-Binding Domain:
    ER-DBD Complex   Base pair & backbone contacts.

ERback Return to ER Intro Page


5.26.01